Well well well... It's nice to be back. Here's a 1956 Chevy Truck for you to enjoy. I met the owner of this gem at a burger joint yesterday and knew this would be the perfect shot to rejoin the daily battle. I see that the pixel pickers are still on duty blowing up shots to find the flaws hidden in perfectly acceptable shots. I have missed you all, and am ready to throw up a few choice pics for your pleasure. I hope you like!
29 Dec 01:17
__banned__user_
Oh yea the mutual fallatio brigade are still here and pixel police as strong as ever. Post, laugh at the uninformed comments and enjoy Billy's witticisms. Nice shot fella
29 Dec 02:05
Randall.Lohr
Well, Steve, I think we have more "cunning linguists" than you may have supposed. Thanks for the compliment and the laugh.
29 Dec 02:11
__banned__user_
Its really good to you back my sharp as a tack witted friend. We shall both be banned I feel for innuendo and the use of inappropriate language. I can certainly say I have been ejected from better places lol
29 Dec 04:33
digicam
Like this one much better Randall. Great job with the Low Light situation.
29 Dec 06:11
jphoto
Perfect capture and process Randall. I got to get back to Canada and take more shots of these great machines!
29 Dec 08:02
dirk
Like this "used" car.
Nice details and control of light.
29 Dec 13:14
pixel_komando
cool!
29 Dec 13:22
zhaojisheng
It is a wonderful work and I wish you Happy New Year!
29 Dec 13:45
inkslinger
Superb Randall far better than yesterday IMHO...
29 Dec 14:55
tryphon
I like it a lot!
29 Dec 15:38
tatofotoartex
10
29 Dec 16:08
rcuello
I'll comment on the reverse, because I do not would give 10:
Dark shadows, no loss of detail, this item no. Lights out, despite having a light tube, there is no loss of detail, in this item neither could lower the score. Composition: POV from bottom to to
29 Dec 16:09
rcuello
... bottom to top, half profile, showing the best of the truck, here I can not subtract. Saturation: balanced, not here. Halos, no. Hey so far can not find a default to lower the score. Ah, maybe in the process I can grab to lower your score, we see: over
29 Dec 16:10
rcuello
... we see: over processing, I do not see. Sharpness..balanced. Randall, after an exhaustive analysis, I see no reason to give it less than 10 points.
I did not want to give it 10 because were going to say that the reason was because you pay me a beer in
29 Dec 16:11
rcuello
.. a beer in atlanta, I did all my effort to give 9 and could not.
29 Dec 17:12
josephc
Thankfully the general tone of the conversation seems to have improved as we move down the page! Excellent low light shot.
29 Dec 19:19
Randall.Lohr
Thanks everyone. And especially Ricardo for the strong defense of my shot. Perhaps one day I will earn the full score...
Well well well... It's nice to be back. Here's a 1956 Chevy Truck for you to enjoy. I met the owner of this gem at a burger joint yesterday and knew this would be the perfect shot to rejoin the daily battle. I see that the pixel pickers are still on duty blowing up shots to find the flaws hidden in perfectly acceptable shots. I have missed you all, and am ready to throw up a few choice pics for your pleasure. I hope you like!
Oh yea the mutual fallatio brigade are still here and pixel police as strong as ever. Post, laugh at the uninformed comments and enjoy Billy's witticisms. Nice shot fella
Well, Steve, I think we have more "cunning linguists" than you may have supposed. Thanks for the compliment and the laugh.
Its really good to you back my sharp as a tack witted friend. We shall both be banned I feel for innuendo and the use of inappropriate language. I can certainly say I have been ejected from better places lol
Like this one much better Randall. Great job with the Low Light situation.
Perfect capture and process Randall. I got to get back to Canada and take more shots of these great machines!
Like this "used" car. Nice details and control of light.
cool!
It is a wonderful work and I wish you Happy New Year!
Superb Randall far better than yesterday IMHO...
I like it a lot!
10
I'll comment on the reverse, because I do not would give 10: Dark shadows, no loss of detail, this item no. Lights out, despite having a light tube, there is no loss of detail, in this item neither could lower the score. Composition: POV from bottom to to
... bottom to top, half profile, showing the best of the truck, here I can not subtract. Saturation: balanced, not here. Halos, no. Hey so far can not find a default to lower the score. Ah, maybe in the process I can grab to lower your score, we see: over
... we see: over processing, I do not see. Sharpness..balanced. Randall, after an exhaustive analysis, I see no reason to give it less than 10 points. I did not want to give it 10 because were going to say that the reason was because you pay me a beer in
.. a beer in atlanta, I did all my effort to give 9 and could not.
Thankfully the general tone of the conversation seems to have improved as we move down the page! Excellent low light shot.
Thanks everyone. And especially Ricardo for the strong defense of my shot. Perhaps one day I will earn the full score...
Great car.
10
the truck is very sharp
Sehr schön