Thanks In Advance To Almost All Who View, Comment, and Vote....Much Appreciated!
Download for BEST View.
10 Apr 00:26
__banned__user_
Nice car but shoot the painter huh Absolutely aeful colours to paint a delightful car. little lack of sharpness and loss of detail in the shadows. Nice treatment though. An honest 8
10 Apr 02:00
Randall.Lohr
Beautiful car and process… I would think that the lack of sharpness in the background is due (intentionally) to a wider open f-stop at 3.5. Anyone who has shot for a while knows that f22 or more would bring in the background, but then you would need to i
10 Apr 02:01
Randall.Lohr
increase the ISO thereby increasing noise which would be a bad trade IMHO.
10 Apr 02:44
digicam
Ahh, a man with knowledge about photography. There are those who Know and others who think they know. Thanks Randall, I see you understand Aperture very well.
10 Apr 03:17
Randall.Lohr
Perhaps our friend Billy needs to create some new friends to back up his new found knowledge of the physics of light. Buy :
http://www.physics4kids.com/files/light_lens.html
10 Apr 05:06
gedmas
A picture which is very delicious for eyes. And very quality shot and process. Should be the lady's car, in my opinion.
10 Apr 06:09
pixel_komando
Dream cars are back, yes! :D
10 Apr 06:59
yvesd
Très propre
10 Apr 08:41
bjosted
Clean and sharp
10 Apr 09:15
__banned__user_
To anybody that bothers to download it the f-stop is shown at 5.6 on the exif not a wide open 3.5. That's why its important to download before passing comment and check if its your own photo before agreeing.
10 Apr 11:58
yoctox
10
10 Apr 12:48
digicam
@ Billy, It is True the REAL Aperture is F/5.6 I posted F/3.5 so Randy and I could make a point that you're NOT only a Cheat but Cyber Thief.
10 Apr 12:50
digicam
There is NO way of checking this Metadata unless you Save my image to your computer. I Sir NEVER gave you PERMISSION to Save any of my work to your Computer. Making you a Cyber Thief.
Want Images? Go to a Wallpaper Site!
10 Apr 13:14
digicam
BTW: Randall is Correct in saying that whether it be F/3.5 or F/5.6 they would both have the same effect on the background as compared to an F/22.
Point made THIEF CAPTURED!
10 Apr 14:43
deleted_user_
That´s right gang up on billy... Calling him a cyber thier !? If you allowed downloading: he is in his rights as long as he does not sell, reproduce or what´s so ever your work.
10 Apr 14:44
deleted_user_
What is his crime ? Why shouldn´t he be enjoying freedom of expression and share his opinion ? If some cannot handle the critic it is not his problem but the other´s.
10 Apr 14:44
deleted_user_
If he really annoys you, be the bigger man and just ignore him...
10 Apr 14:46
deleted_user_
Now for the photo, I really like it! Clean process, nice color contrast.10
10 Apr 16:19
digicam
@ Florian, while what you say may have some Truth to it True Florian, I See Download and have always used it as a source for getting a better view of an image that the smaller images do not show.
10 Apr 16:22
digicam
But I NEVER DOWNLOAD and SAVE to my computer. If the image is NOT MINE I have NO BUSINESS having another members image on my Computer unless I was asked to do so or I ask the member in advance permission to do so. It's a simple matter of respect for other
10 Apr 16:25
digicam
It's a simple matter of respect for others property.
Now when a member Downloads my images or anyone else's image and SAVES in order to thoroughly check EXIF then perhaps they should be deemed Microscope Police.
10 Apr 16:26
digicam
Thanks Florian for opinion on this matter and I am glad you approve of my image. Thanks so much for your comment and vote....it is Much Appreciated!
10 Apr 17:04
sanz3jo
I like the contrast, have seen better work from you but still a ten. Download topic has many sides, I think that while the user download your picture to confirm Exif don't see nothing wrong with that is that is the only purpose. Maybe you have to add so
Mario, I see and respect your POV in this matter.
But I still would not SAVE to my Computer any members image without prior approval from said member. I've asked Carlo to change from DOWNLOAD to View Largest Image. Hope he approves.
If Carlo does NOT change DOWNLOAD to VIEW LARGEST IMAGE then I will certainly post as you advised. Thanks for your help and Thanks for your comment and vote on my image as well.
10 Apr 18:14
flipd1
I like the image as is. There are sites like 500PX which prevent the save option all together. This is just one suggestion of course. The greater issue is not only this but the multiple accounts as well. Freedom of expression is one thing, freedom of
10 Apr 18:16
flipd1
freedom of expression with multiple accounts in order to manipulate the outcome of the votes is a totally different thing altogether.
10 Apr 18:46
inkslinger
I have seen better from you Ed but still worthy of a 10...
10 Apr 18:48
inkslinger
Shouldn't shout too loud Phil about multiple accounts.....Hey....
10 Apr 21:07
deleted_user_
Sorry for feeding the discussion on your photo´s comment section Ed. I can somehow understand your point but anybody with an account could download photos of users and sell them, print them, manipulate them... If one feels uncomfortable with it : the only
10 Apr 21:08
deleted_user_
solution (atm) would be to restrict the download option and then loose the better view.
10 Apr 21:12
deleted_user_
@phil I do not know all the story since I am not very active here anymore. Still, no matter why he did use multiple accounts to mess with the voting system : he paid for it with a ban. Burning and hanging does not apply anymore for this kind of "felony" l
10 Apr 22:30
romzhy
10
10 Apr 22:40
josephc
Pristine.
11 Apr 00:10
pixel_komando
Congrats for your POTD! Put the bad in the trash can and keep the good around you :) Don't waste your time with so negative persons!
Thanks In Advance To Almost All Who View, Comment, and Vote....Much Appreciated! Download for BEST View.
Nice car but shoot the painter huh Absolutely aeful colours to paint a delightful car. little lack of sharpness and loss of detail in the shadows. Nice treatment though. An honest 8
Beautiful car and process… I would think that the lack of sharpness in the background is due (intentionally) to a wider open f-stop at 3.5. Anyone who has shot for a while knows that f22 or more would bring in the background, but then you would need to i
increase the ISO thereby increasing noise which would be a bad trade IMHO.
Ahh, a man with knowledge about photography. There are those who Know and others who think they know. Thanks Randall, I see you understand Aperture very well.
Perhaps our friend Billy needs to create some new friends to back up his new found knowledge of the physics of light. Buy : http://www.physics4kids.com/files/light_lens.html
A picture which is very delicious for eyes. And very quality shot and process. Should be the lady's car, in my opinion.
Dream cars are back, yes! :D
Très propre
Clean and sharp
To anybody that bothers to download it the f-stop is shown at 5.6 on the exif not a wide open 3.5. That's why its important to download before passing comment and check if its your own photo before agreeing.
10
@ Billy, It is True the REAL Aperture is F/5.6 I posted F/3.5 so Randy and I could make a point that you're NOT only a Cheat but Cyber Thief.
There is NO way of checking this Metadata unless you Save my image to your computer. I Sir NEVER gave you PERMISSION to Save any of my work to your Computer. Making you a Cyber Thief. Want Images? Go to a Wallpaper Site!
BTW: Randall is Correct in saying that whether it be F/3.5 or F/5.6 they would both have the same effect on the background as compared to an F/22. Point made THIEF CAPTURED!
That´s right gang up on billy... Calling him a cyber thier !? If you allowed downloading: he is in his rights as long as he does not sell, reproduce or what´s so ever your work.
What is his crime ? Why shouldn´t he be enjoying freedom of expression and share his opinion ? If some cannot handle the critic it is not his problem but the other´s.
If he really annoys you, be the bigger man and just ignore him...
Now for the photo, I really like it! Clean process, nice color contrast.10
@ Florian, while what you say may have some Truth to it True Florian, I See Download and have always used it as a source for getting a better view of an image that the smaller images do not show.
But I NEVER DOWNLOAD and SAVE to my computer. If the image is NOT MINE I have NO BUSINESS having another members image on my Computer unless I was asked to do so or I ask the member in advance permission to do so. It's a simple matter of respect for other
It's a simple matter of respect for others property. Now when a member Downloads my images or anyone else's image and SAVES in order to thoroughly check EXIF then perhaps they should be deemed Microscope Police.
Thanks Florian for opinion on this matter and I am glad you approve of my image. Thanks so much for your comment and vote....it is Much Appreciated!
I like the contrast, have seen better work from you but still a ten. Download topic has many sides, I think that while the user download your picture to confirm Exif don't see nothing wrong with that is that is the only purpose. Maybe you have to add so
...something like this: "All rights reserved by © __________ Image cannot be used, edited or modified without my written consent"
Mario, I see and respect your POV in this matter. But I still would not SAVE to my Computer any members image without prior approval from said member. I've asked Carlo to change from DOWNLOAD to View Largest Image. Hope he approves.
As for your advice..." "All rights reserved by © __________ Image cannot be used, edited or modified without my written consent" I have © Digicam at bottom of images and there is a Disclaimer at bottom of each page on Crème.
If Carlo does NOT change DOWNLOAD to VIEW LARGEST IMAGE then I will certainly post as you advised. Thanks for your help and Thanks for your comment and vote on my image as well.
I like the image as is. There are sites like 500PX which prevent the save option all together. This is just one suggestion of course. The greater issue is not only this but the multiple accounts as well. Freedom of expression is one thing, freedom of
freedom of expression with multiple accounts in order to manipulate the outcome of the votes is a totally different thing altogether.
I have seen better from you Ed but still worthy of a 10...
Shouldn't shout too loud Phil about multiple accounts.....Hey....
Sorry for feeding the discussion on your photo´s comment section Ed. I can somehow understand your point but anybody with an account could download photos of users and sell them, print them, manipulate them... If one feels uncomfortable with it : the only
solution (atm) would be to restrict the download option and then loose the better view.
@phil I do not know all the story since I am not very active here anymore. Still, no matter why he did use multiple accounts to mess with the voting system : he paid for it with a ban. Burning and hanging does not apply anymore for this kind of "felony" l
10
Pristine.
Congrats for your POTD! Put the bad in the trash can and keep the good around you :) Don't waste your time with so negative persons!